Coming Soon

WorkforceNewYork.com

AEDT Compliance Manager runs your NYC Local Law 144 audit calendar, generates the 10-business-day candidate notice, and gives you a deterministic, citable answer for the NY WARN automation-disclosure checkbox — plus the only maintained AEDT vendor bias-audit registry on the market.

License ComplianceFrom $249/mo
WorkforceNewYork.com marketing site
Visit site

Overview

A system of record for New York employers running automated employment decision tools. Three legs: compliance operations (AEDT inventory, LL144 audit calendar, candidate notices, and audit-readiness packaging for the auditor you separately engage); a deterministic WARN attribution engine with no model inference, reproducible and citable; and a maintained registry of AEDT vendor bias audits so you can answer "is this vendor deployable in NYC?" in one click. Tags are role-level only, never individual scoring, and the product never performs or certifies a bias audit — by design.

The problem

There is no system of record for the AEDT inventory or the LL144 audit calendar, which costs roughly $6,000/yr in manual HR-admin tracking. Candidate notice compliance is manual and unverifiable — no delivery log, no proof of notice. The new NY WARN automation-disclosure checkbox has no documented rationale process, adding ~$1,200/yr of ad hoc legal research. And nothing tells you whether a prospective AEDT vendor even holds a valid, non-expired bias audit.

Key features

  • AEDT inventory register with a historical change log
  • One-click vendor "deployable in NYC?" lookup
  • LL144 audit calendar with escalating reminders
  • 10-business-day candidate notice generator with proof-of-notice
  • Deterministic WARN attribution engine with a citable methodology page
  • Maintained AEDT vendor bias-audit registry
  • Audit-readiness packaging for the independent auditor you engage

Benefits & outcomes

  • Replace the tracking spreadsheet with a system of record — roughly $6,000/yr of HR-admin labor
  • Prove candidate notice was delivered, rather than asserting it
  • Answer the WARN automation-disclosure checkbox with a reproducible, citable rationale
  • Screen a vendor's bias-audit status before you deploy, not after